Exit Planning Exchange

By The Bigelow Company LLC

Every business owner who’s thinking of selling his company “someday” wants to know:

“Will a strategic buyer or a private equity buyer value my company more highly?”

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Nor is there a one-size-fits-allanswer to how private equity groups value their target acquisitions. Inthis Lesson, we’ll explore three hot-button issues that concern everyfinancial investor – as well as most strategic buyers.

It’s a Seller’s Market

The past ten years have seen explosive growth in private equitytransactions; there is an abundance of capital chasing a limited supplyof solid investment opportunities. With over 1,300 private equity firmsin the U.S. alone, no one can claim to know all the ins and outs of theirvaluation methodologies. Our experience with private equity groupssuggests that there’s almost always a wide value range among competing offers. We have had first hand experience that, when given exactlythe same information about a company, sophisticated financial buyers’purchase offers will vary as much as 50% from one another.

Financial Buyers Focus on Three Key Drivers

Despite the wide variance in private equity offers, they do all share the same common focus: the target acquisition’s potential for future growth. In this regard, they focus on three key indicators of that potential:

• The growth rate in your revenue and profits.

If your growth over the past 3-5 years has been static, they’ll likely look the other way, or assign a modest multiple of cash flow.

• Your EBITDA.

Private equity buyers love companies with high EBITDA margins and low capital requirements. A high EBITDA percentage on revenues validates that your customers value your product and service highly, and find it worth paying for. (The reverse is also true.)

• The amount of debt your business can reasonably carry.

The formulas for determining how much debt a business can supporthave changed significantly as the capital markets have become awash in sources of low-cost secured and unsecured debt capital.

Capital providers are willing and eager to provide both senior secured and subordinated debt to most private equity-backed buyouts. Instead of looking at your fixed assets and receivables for coverage, they’ll look at your EBITDA.

A general rule of thumb in today’s market is that investors will take on senior and subordinated debt of up to four times your EBITDA to finance a recapitalization. For example, we recently helped to sell a company with $5 million in EBITDA, but less than $10 million in total assets.

The purchase price was $35 million – 7x EBITDA. The private equity buyer recapitalized the company’s balance sheet with $20 million in debt (twice the amount of the business’ underlyingassets) in order to finance the purchase – $13 million in secured debt from a bank, and $7 million from a subordinated debt lender.

Every buyer will also look at important qualitative issues such as:

• What industry are you in and what opportunities for futuregrowth exist?

• Are you an industry leader or a “me too” player?

• Is your management team seasoned, solid, and stable?

This qualitative issue will enhance (or depress) the quantitive valuation.  Above all, however, private equity groups are driven by one thing – their potential rate of return on investment.

Given These Key Drivers, Why Do Valuations Vary So Widely?

Every private equity group has its own unique attributes. Some focus on industries in which they have experience and expertise, while others look for synergy with the existing companies in their portfolios. New funds are particularly eager to make acquisitions in order to develop a track record, while mature funds may look aggressively for one final investment in order to wrap up the Fund.  The challenge for an intermediary is to find the best-fit investor with the greatest motivation.  That investor will usually value your business most highly.

A Game Plan for Attracting Rich Suitors

Knowing what private equity buyers care about points the way to an action plan for increasing the future valuation of your business:

• Follow a business plan that represents strong opportunity for growth.  For some companies, that may mean taking on more risk than they’ve been accustomed to in the past – especially if their owners have been investing only their personal capital in order to grow (See Lesson #1).

• Focus on your EBITDA.  If you can raise your profit margin onrevenues, it will validate your attractiveness to potential suitors.

• Be careful about marginally useful capital investments in your business. A financial buyer will want to know the history of your capital requirements. A pattern of inordinately high, ongoing capital investment can scare off an acquirer.

By Thinking Like an Acquirer, Forest Frames Earned an Exceptional Valuation

When Woody Beeman tapped into the growing demand for prefabricated lumber products, he quickly outstripped his mom and pop lumberyard competitors. He developed a supply chain and processes that saved time, waste, and errors, and built a loyal customer base. After15 years of steady growth, Woody was ready to hang up his hammer, but saw that the company was not yet ready to attract its full potential valuation.  Knowing that he needed diamond blade talent to carve a compelling story, Woody hired a visionary CEO and designed a program for him to receive a 15% stake in the business.  Tom Barrett understood capital gain events, and what both strategic and private equity buyers look for in an acquisition. He started with a blueprint of buyer expectations – and worked backward to map their goals to Forest Frames’ existing business plan.  He knew that private equity groups want a solid ground floor (exceptional EBITDA over several years) with a well-designed stairway to a lofty future. He also knew that acquirers tend to devalue capital-intensive operations that are likely to demand ongoing investment in fixed assets. And they like ideas and processes that can bereplicated.

Tom developed an aggressive growth plan for Forest Frames Industries based on a strategy that changed his competitive playing field. Realizing that on-time, predictable delivery was the perennial concern for both Big Box retailers and independent contractors, he invested in equipment that allowed him to produce custom framing products on a just-in-time basis. With guaranteed 24-hour delivery, most customers were happy to pay a premium for a higher quality product, delivered exactly when they needed it. They couldn’t get this service from any of Forest Frames’ competitors.

When Woody and Tom asked The Bigelow Company to represent Forest Frames to potential investors, the company had a solid, three-year history of outstanding EBITDA, minimal capital requirements, a loyal customer base, and a concept that could be replicated in other regions. Motivated on an incentive piecework plan and profit sharing, their workers ran three shifts to achieve better throughput and productivity.

Not surprisingly, Forest Frames received more than a handful of high-multiple bids.  They picked a private equity group with other construction-related companies in its portfolio that was willing to pay 8x EBITDA. Woody cashed out and Tom continued on to build and capture an even higher value for the new majority owners and himself in a subsequent transaction.

This “Lesson Learned for Building and Capturing Value” reflects knowledge and insights we’ve gained working with dozens of privately-held companies throughout North America.  For more information about The Bigelow Company, visit www.bigelowco.com or call us at 603-433-6000 for a confidential discussion of your unique situation.

By Joseph C. Marrow

Choosing the best exit strategy for a company is a daunting task.  The goal for business owners is to maximize the value of the enterprise for themselves, their employees and their stockholders.  Some popular exit strategies include a sale to the highest bidder or a strategic partner, a public offering in the United States or abroad, or a sale of an interest in the business to a private equity investor.  To determine the best alternative, it is necessary to weigh several factors.  Is the business best positioned for a sale (based on the industry or the scope and size of the enterprise) or do the public markets or a private equity investor present an opportunity to brand and grow the business?  Do the business owners desire to remain with the company or is the preference for a clean break?  Is it a buyers or sellers market?  Are the capital markets open to new issuances?  These are some of the questions that should be assessed when making a determination how to proceed.  The best advice is to plan ahead.  Even if you have no immediate plans to pursue an exit, you should understand the markets and think strategically to best position your business for a liquidity event down the road.

Planning for an exit event is critical for you and your business.  What steps should you be taking in the planning process?  As counsel to a variety of business at different stages, we are often asked to weigh in on strategic alternatives.  Having worked with business owners over the years in planning for and effectuating liquidity events, several common themes have emerged.

1.  FOCUS ON EXECUTION

Above all else, keep focused on the execution of your business plan.  Planning for and executing a liquidity event can be an extremely time consuming and distracting process.  Don’t let it be!  If you remain steadfast in the achievement of your business objectives, execute on your plan, dedicate yourself to attracting real customers and revenues, your exit event will take care of itself.  The primary focus of the business owner should always be on the success of the enterprise, not the consummation of the exit.

2.  BE BOUGHT, NOT SOLD

One common mistake business owners make in the pursuit of an exit strategy is to lose sight of the short-term needs of the business.  For example, a business may have some short-term capital needs to address to attract, retain and grow its customer base.  The business owner, believing an exit event is at hand, may elect to forego the short-term expense in light of an impending transaction.  A failure to address short-term cash needs, however, could have long-term repercussions.  Several factors dictate that it is better to spend the money now.  Transactions can often disappear as easily as they arise or a transaction can take significantly longer than expected.  Equally important, the long-term success of the business may be tied to the transaction.  Often times earn-outs, bonuses under employment contracts or other consideration depend on the financial performance of the seller’s business post-liquidity event.  For these reasons, sellers should continue to run their businesses in the ordinary course and meet short-term capital needs to achieve long-term objectives.  Saving a few dollars now could certainly cost the seller many dollars in the long run.

3.  SURROUND YOURSELF WITH EXCELLENT ADVISORS

Unless you have some transactional experience, a liquidity event poses many challenges to a business owner.  The nature of the transaction (M&A or IPO), the specific terms of the transaction and continuing obligations after the sale, employment issues and tax and accounting considerations present a litany of issues to consider.  It is neither necessary nor advisable to go through the process alone.  Seasoned professionals are available to guide the seller through the process.  Very early on, you should engage an experienced attorney, accountant and other advisors (such as an investment banker) to assist you.  Lean on your advisors.  It is not uncommon to hear the CEO of a company explain that he or she has achieved great success because he or she has surrounded himself or herself with smart people.  If you choose carefully, the advisors will have a great deal of experience to draw from and will be able to provide excellent guidance recommending exit alternatives, structuring the transaction, avoiding pitfalls, preparing the company for a liquidity event and completing the transaction.  Many business owners raise concerns regarding the costs involved in engaging service professionals, however, most business owners that have experienced a liquidity event will attest that the right professionals add to, rather than detract from the value of a particular transaction.  In addition, the better the advisors, the more time a business owner can devote to the matter at hand – the day-to-day operations of the business.

4.  CHOOSE CORRECT EXIT STRATEGY

There are several options when considering exit alternatives.  For many, a sale of the business is the logical choice.  Others may opt to raise money through the public markets or to sell a piece of the company to private equity investors.  Recently, the public markets, in particular, have not been an attractive option.  While many are familiar with the perceived downsides to going public (compliance costs, personal liability exposure of officers and directors and short-term financial performance pressures), there can be legitimate reasons to test the public markets (creating a national brand, providing liquidity to employees and investors or using the publicly-traded stock as currency in a roll-up strategy).  Still others have used the public offering route to attract buyers.  In addition, private equity can provide a much needed capital infusion to a company.  A business that accepts private equity investment should note that with the investment comes a fairly short-term liquidity horizon – 5 to 7 years to position the company for sale or to go public.  Once again, professional advisors can be extremely helpful in vetting the available options and guiding a business through the process.

Choosing and pursuing an exit strategy is both exciting and intimidating.  A business owner contemplating a liquidity event is faced with a myriad of issues.  Selecting the correct route to follow is not always easy.  Moreover, above all else, in pursuing a liquidity path, make sure your number one priority is the continued health and prosperity of the ongoing business.

For more information, please contact Joseph Marrow at jmarrow@mbbp.com.

By William S. Andronico and Craig Eaton

As the U.S. emerges from the recession that has plagued the economy during the past 18 months, private equity firms that have been entrenched in their investments are beginning to evaluate exit options in the hopes of earning what is now a long overdue return on their investments. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty on the horizon and as a result, transactions are being subjected to deeper scrutiny as buyers seek out companies with a compelling growth story that can withstand today’s prolonged due diligence process.

In this market, there is no guarantee that any exit will be as timely or profitable as fund investors would hope or require, but market ready businesses can still be sold quickly and at a solid multiple. The key to success? Strategically preparing for an exit. Not only will exit readiness enable the efficient execution of a sale, but it will also maximize its value.

How Important Is Exit Readiness?

As credit markets have tightened, it has become even more critical that companies looking to sell anticipate risks and issues that might arise and potentially disrupt, or lower the value of a deal. Buyers will undoubtedly uncover any hidden problems during the buy-side due diligence process; therefore, it’s important that the seller is aware of any “hidden gems” and has that knowledge available when negotiating sale price.

In addition, there is an ever-present “need for speed” during any transaction, particularly given the drain on management’s time and energy associated with preparing for and executing a sale. In order to quickly and effectively execute a transaction, it’s critical that the seller is fully prepared to exit when the business is taken to market. If not, the seller risks exposing the company to the buyer, prolonging the deal and ultimately lowering the sale price.

Sell-side Due Diligence: Readying For An Exit

Sell-side due diligence is a valuable component of any exit strategy, particularly in today’s uncertain economic environment. Sophisticated bidders have advisors on hand to find any problems within the business and therefore, it’s important that the seller has taken an in-depth look at the company in advance to prevent any unwanted surprises. Sell-side due diligence allows the seller to proactively address any risk areas of the deal and can even expedite the transaction process. Well executed sell-side due diligence includes a thorough assessment of the financial health of the company, as well as an evaluation of all operational, technological and human resource issues. A thorough sell-side due diligence partner assists with five critical phases of the deal:

1. Pre-sale planning. The seller and its due diligence partner must identify any potential issues in order to avoid broken deals or decreased valuations. Pre-sale planning includes performing due diligence and preparing an analysis of the business positioning, providing support and insight for the information memorandum and assessing the baseline valuations range, among other activities.
2. Data room and management presentations. It’s critical to develop financial data and schedules on a basis of accounting consistent with the information memorandum.
3. Negotiation and execution. Sell-side due diligence enables the seller to anticipate the purchaser’s challenges to valuation, support negotiations from a fact-based position of strength and avoid any delays to the transaction process.
4. Operational separation. The seller and its due diligence partner must proactively identify any stand-alone issues including commercial and customer risks, and analyze the cost of those issues.
5. Post-closing issues. Once the deal is closed, the information garnered via thorough sell-side due diligence can help with purchase price adjustments and other post-closing issues that might arise.

Sell-side due diligence allows sellers to counter transactional risks by taking a proactive approach to mitigate potential deal breaking issues. Before moving forward with a potential deal, sellers should:

• Evaluate the financial health of the company by assessing the quality of earnings and identifying any non-recurring charges or credits to maximize the company’s value;
• Develop realistic budgets and forecasts;
• Assess trends in revenues and EBITDA to identify key business drivers;
• Appraise the quality of assets to be sold and liabilities that would be assumed;
• Evaluate trends in required working capital and develop a target working capital level in advance of the purchase agreement;
• Appraise the impacts of fixed versus variable costs, capital expenditure requirements and the importance of certain administrative activities;
• Identify internal management and operational weaknesses, as well as any potential transitional issues;
• Identify tax risks including federal, state and sales tax obligations;
• Determine the optimal tax structure of the seller before the deal and for the deal, and evaluate the impact on potential buyers;
• Consider related party activities and the related transfer pricing or intercompany activities;
• Define key terms and expectations in purchase agreements;
• Mind the GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles)

Tax Pitfalls and Opportunities

Whether the exit involves an IPO, a strategic/financial acquisition, or another exit option, tax matters can and do drive valuation, specifically when valuable tax assets such as net operating losses and tax credits exist. Two primary areas that require attention are the deal structure and the optimization of the underlying tax assets residing within the target.

From the seller’s perspective, it is essential to:

• Negotiate whether the sale will be an asset sale or a sale of stock. From a tax standpoint, a stock sale will generally benefit the seller and therefore, if it is an asset sale, it’s important to get a premium on the asset sale to put the seller in the same after-tax cash position.
• Consider state tax exposures prior to sale and to mitigate any concerns that might arise. For example, the seller should look at how to structure the sale from a state income tax perspective, evaluating ways to allocate income to low-tax states.
• Look at items such as tax accounting methods that might trigger income on an asset or stock sale, and evaluate how to mitigate the impact on the sale.
• Look for the possibility of tax-free reorganizations, particularly if dealing with a public strategic buyer.

An agreement between the parties related to taxes on a pre- and post- transaction basis should be drafted. Issues related to taxes such as documentation related to basis, net operating losses and credits come up several years after transactions are completed and it is important to identify the responsibilities of both the seller and buyer. This includes taxes triggered through change-of-control payments.

The choice of entity and whether the sale is structured as the sale of stock, a straight asset sale or a deemed asset sale can have many variables that should be considered prior to sale.

Looking Ahead…

As markets and exit multiples continue to stabilize and investor demand for liquidity continues, private equity firms are seizing the opportunity for potential exit strategies – looking to maximize the return on their investments. However, planning how to exit an investment is just as important as completing the transaction. Companies should be sure they’ve considered all options and invest proactively in presale diligence to expedite the sale process, maintain control and credibility, and enhance exit value.

By Andrew Crain and Rod Robertson

The knockdown wave that paralyzed merger & acquisition activity in the lower- and middle-market since September 2008 has rapidly receded, promising a rising tide of dealmaking in 2011.  All the components for an active M&A market are in place:  pent-up deal supply, as frustrated sellers adjust valuation expectations and private equity funds seek to realize long-held portfolio investments; pent-up buyer demand, as corporations replace their recent fixation on cost cutting and liquidity preservation with an increased focus on top-line revenue growth and as private equity groups put uninvested funds to work; and increased capital availability, as credit is once again available at favorable rates and companies once again have healthy balance sheets and cash to invest.

M & A TRENDS AT 2010 YEAR-END

Dealmaking began to rebound in the second half of 2010.  Thomson Reuters reports that “as of December 14, dealmakers have announced 7,258 U.S. transactions worth $773.5 billion this year though some may not be completed.  Last year, 6,503 deals worth $731.5 billion were completed.”   PriceWaterhouse Coopers found a similar trend in the middle market, “logging 724 deals worth a combined $240 billion in disclosed value, up 54% over 2009.  Average deal size also grew, elevating to $247 million, compared to $219 million last year, a trend PwC attributes to the availability of debt, strategic buyer optimism and the substantial private equity overhang,” as reported in Mergers Unleashed on December 10.

Our conversations with buyers and sellers indicate that many more deals were pushing to close by 2010 yearend, but sellers motivated to close for tax reasons paused for breath once the Bush tax cuts were extended and those deals will now kick off a strong 2011 instead.

SELLERS RELUCTANTLY RETURN

The decade-long run up to the recession, with both earnings and valuations (as multiples of earnings) growing year after year, set sellers’ expectations at levels reminiscent of the internet bubble.  The downturn paralyzed most M&A activity as the new playing field was met with dismay by owners of small- and medium-sized businesses.  Depressed valuations, the return of in-depth due diligence, and the disappearance of covenant-lite purchase & sale agreements all combined to drive patient sellers to the sidelines.  Those left to sell in 2009 and early 2010 were, typically, distressed companies selling at distressed prices in bankruptcy or liquidations.

As the economy steadied and credit loosened in mid-2010, valuations began their return to pre-recession levels.  According to GF Data Resources, which tracks private equity deals ranging in value from $10 – $250 million, enterprise valuations across that size range averaged 6.0X in the third quarter of 2010, and even the smallest size subset ($10 – $25 million) reached an average of 5.8X EBITDA.

Sellers today have reconciled to the fact that valuations have rebounded to sustainably sensible levels, and they are no longer sitting on the sidelines in hope of higher returns.  Many owners who plowed ahead funding losses, counting on an economic rebound for rescue, now see economic forecasts for slow growth at best.  Aging owners who postponed retirement are now ready to sell.  Private equity owners who held portfolio companies beyond planned time horizons are now rushing to realize their investments, especially those who will be fundraising in 2011 and 2012. Thus we foresee a steady flow of sellers coming into the M&A market this year.

A FIELD DAY FOR BUYERS

Well-capitalized strategic buyers remained active acquiring distressed competitors throughout the recession and, armed with inexpensive credit and abundant cash, continue to be opportunistic.  Other companies are entering the fray as confidence returns and leaders shift their focus from preservation to acquisition.  Others, faced with a sluggish recovery and prospects for slow growth, seek acquisitions to drive growth externally.  The combined impact of these motivations will be substantial, as a recent mergermarket.com survey showed that 82% of US business executives expect increased M&A activity over the next 6 to 12 months.

Private equity buyers are equally motivated to do deals.  With the “overhang” of uninvested PE funds reaching a reported $500 Billion, there is urgency to put those funds to work.  PE managers are also cognizant that acquisitions done during and after economic downturns historically yield higher returns than those completed during boom years.  As a result, according to GF Data Resources, “private equity groups are becoming less discriminating in their choice of targets given the pressure on them to invest funds.  There are more B and B+ properties on the market now and sponsors are willing to pay a little more for them.”

Entrepreneurial buyers, driven to the sidelines in the boom years by larger and better-financed financial and strategic buyers paying high valuations, are now re-entering the game.  The recession flushed many senior- and middle-management executives into the job market through downsizing and corporate closures.  Many of these talented executives are taking matters into their own hands, using their strategic skills to identify and acquire companies with favorable investment characteristics.  However, many entrepreneurs find that they must rely on seller financing or private equity backing in order to credibly pursue and close acquisitions of even modest size.

THE TIPPING POINT

We believe that this confluence of events will lead to a resurgence of M&A activity in 2011.  Orphaned companies and firms mortally stricken during the recession have been purchased, cannibalized or are seeking a buyer as we write.  Sellers realize that if they want to exit, now is the time as the economy rebounds and as favorable tax rates have been extended for another two-year window.  Strategic, private equity and entrepreneurial buyers have returned to the market and enterprise valuations have rebounded to pre-recession levels.  Commercial banks and mezzanine lenders are permitting buyers to place more debt on pragmatic deals.  In sum, sellers, buyers and lenders have all returned to the M&A market and are converging on common ground where excesses have been curbed and sensibility should reign once again, permitting dealflow to flourish in 2011.

By Michael Oleksak

In the early days of my consulting practice, I met with the owner of a small manufacturing business. The owner had just learned he had inoperable cancer and confided that he would be dead in about six months. He did not have a succession plan but hoped his daughter, who was then 22 years old, would take over the business.  The owner wasn’t sure because he had not discussed this plan with his daughter yet.  Ultimately, the business owner turned to his accountant, who was also a close family friend, to oversee the transfer of the company to his daughter while the accountant stayed on as advisor. Because it was cancer, the owner had time to draw up a will and organize his estate.

His succession plan for the company, however, started with hoping his daughter would take over its management. His exit strategy had been determined by his health.

Prepare for Sudden Changes in Management or Ownership

Imagine you were this business owner’s commercial banker. Your small-business borrower drops this situation in your lap. Your first reaction is disbelief: This middle-aged man looks healthy. Then you become sad because you know and like this person.  But when you hear the owner’s succession plan is to hope he can leave the company to his young daughter, you wonder: “What experience does this just-out-of college daughter have?  Have I even met her?” This leads to more questions.

• How will employees react?
• How will customers react?
• How will you as a lender react?
• What is the future of this company?
• Will it stay financially healthy enough to repay the loan?

No question, the lender’s risk just went up. Should the interest rate rise as well? Is there a change of ownership clause in the loan agreement?  The owner’s terminal illness is not his fault. It is, however, his responsibility to prepare for eventualities like his own untimely death. His family, employees and company rely on his leadership and foresight to anticipate future issues.

By the same token, it is the commercial lender’s duty to ask tough questions to protect the bank’s position. Even if there is a change of ownership clause, you as the lender are in the same boat as your borrower. You want the company to succeed so the loan will be repaid or taken over at some point by another lender. No other lender will want to step in now unless the conditions can be improved with a defined succession plan along with increased collateral or financial support.

Understand the Owner/Manager’s Exit Strategy

Commercial lenders should address this risk by understanding the exit strategy of every owner/manager in their loan portfolios (if these owners even have an exit strategy).  The exit strategy will have a big influence on the strength of your credit as well as on the viability of your relationship with the company.

The exit strategy can lead to a conversation about whether the owner has a will and a succession plan. If the owner has not made a will, this could mean that ownership of the company’s shares is undecided or that the shares could land in the hands of under-prepared family members in case of the owner’s sudden death.

Case in point: Miami Dolphins owner Joe Robbie, a successful real estate attorney, did no estate planning before his death. His heirs had to sell the Dolphins franchise and Joe Robbie Stadium at fire-sale prices to pay estate taxes. The family fractured over the crisis, and Robbie’s legacy is not his successful real estate development career but the poor planning that harmed his family.

As a lender, you need to ask about an owner’s succession plan and whether the firm has the management depth and clear operational assignments to survive a surprising end to the owner’s life or incapacitation. A lender who asks these questions can prompt a business owner to develop a strategy and address shortcomings, thereby alleviating the lender’s concerns about unforeseen occurrences.

What are the possible outcomes for an owner-managed business besides the dire circumstances just addressed? Let’s look at two, both with different implications for the commercial lender: internal transfer and external transfer.

Internal Transfer

An internal ownership transfer could be (1) a sale to the management team, known as a management buyout; (2) a sale to employees via a tax-advantaged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP); or (3) a gifting of shares, usually to the next generation of the family, also with significant tax benefits. If the internal transfers are for less than 50 percent of the ownership shares of the company, the owner may stay in control of decisions and finances by controlling the voting stock.

Influence on relationship with lender. With an internal transfer, the lender should already be familiar with management if there is a change. With a management buyout, the lender should know the individuals taking over and must make a decision about whether the new team can lead the company despite the increased debt to finance the transaction. If not, the bank will ask to be paid out of the loan.

With an ESOP, the transaction will often be for less than the control of the company, a way for the owner to share with loyal employees by giving them an equity stake. A lender’s decision making should be the same, however, given greater debt on the books to finance the purchase. Gifting of company shares may be done in stages, so the current owner or management team may still be in control.

In all of these scenarios, what role will the current commercial lender play? No outside financing source will know the debt-service capability of the company better than the current lender, making it likely that the current lender will be the first invited to stay on to provide loans and services, including financing an internal transaction or ongoing operations.

All these scenarios could be subject to a change of ownership clause in the loan agreement, allowing the lender to opt out if not satisfied with the new ownership structure.

External Transfer

An external transfer would be a sale, either to a strategic buyer (such as a competitor) or to a financial buyer (such as a private equity investor). Because the external transfer will likely be for at least a majority of the shares, the owner will likely be out of the picture in a few years.

Influence on relationship with lender

With external transfers, it is likely that the private equity group or strategic buyer will have its own stable of lenders. By keeping the lines of communication open with the company and the prospective financing team, as well as expressing interest in taking at least a piece of the financing, however, the current lender may well have a role in the new loan or be kept on to provide some services.

Exit Strategy: Not Always Obvious

Commercial lenders are not often thought of as trusted advisors to a company’s business owners. Trusted advisors are generally the company’s CPA, attorney, and, sometimes, the owner’s investment advisor. The fault is not with the banker. Decades ago, the relationship was closer. However, successful lawsuits for lender liability cases have influenced lenders’ behavior. As such, lenders never want their actions to be interpreted by judges as having exerted undue influence over a borrower’s business decisions. Lender liability can result in big financial penalties against the lender.

For this reason, commercial lenders are often out of the loop when it comes to a critical factor influencing the strength and viability of their borrowers: the owner’s exit strategy. Much conversation between a bank and the owner-manager of a business focuses on the owner’s managerial role. It can be hard to get an owner to talk about ownership issues because these often require a discussion of personal and family issues. However, the owner’s exit strategy can have a huge influence on the health of the company and on the bank’s relationship with the company.

A good commercial banker provides numerous services to the owner-managed business, generating considerable fees for the lending institution. Apart from the fees and interest from the loan, the relationship probably also provides income for the bank from cash management services, trade services, account fees and balances.

Sometimes, when the lender is successful in engaging the owner in discussions of exit strategy, the loan and services may be lost anyway. Recently, a 12-store retail chain in the Northeast was sold to a large national retailer. Over the previous year, the lender had actively reviewed all the options facing the owner and the second-generation owners of the family business. In the end, the acquiror will pay out the family members for their shares, and the acquiror’s bank at the corporate level will take over the financing and services. Even with this outcome, the former lender had a good understanding of risk throughout the life of the loan and was able to anticipate some form of upcoming change.

Sources of Strategic Information

The lending officer typically meets regularly with the borrower’s chief financial officer, treasurer, vice president of finance, or controller to discuss the quarter’s results and trends. The lender can use these meetings to ask about ownership issues, including whether the owner has a will, who the beneficiary is regarding the company’s ownership, if there is a succession plan and whether or not there is an exit strategy. If the lending officer is aware of upcoming changes in ownership, the lender can protect the bank’s position as the preferred commercial lender.

The lender can help focus the owner-manager on the future by asking probing and thought-provoking questions about the owner’s will, succession plan and exit strategy. If the owner is reluctant to discuss these issues, the lender should take this as a signal that such plans may not exist.

If there is a board of directors, or board of advisors, the lender should ask these questions:

• Where will the business be in five years?

• Does the owner want to own the business in five years?

• Does the owner want to be managing the business in five years?

• Does the owner have a will?

• Who is currently the beneficiary regarding ownership of the company?

• Is there a succession plan if the owner gets hit by a bus on the way to work?

• Does the owner simply envision the spouse or other relative taking over if something happens?

Owners Want Their Businesses to Live On

Given the personal nature of these questions and their implied reminder of the owner’s mortality, these can be difficult topics to discuss openly. But the commercial lender is a key stakeholder in a business, and asking such questions protects the bank’s interest and capital.

Ultimately, most owners would like their businesses to carry on and thrive even after they are no longer active participants in it.

Creating and sharing details of a will, succession plan and exit strategy with their lender can help build toward a longer, successful existence for the business.

Michael Oleksak was a lender for 17 years at Bank of Boston. He is a principal at Trek Consulting LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts and co-founder of the Exit Planning Exchange. He works with small and medium-sized businesses to increase value and prepare for exit. Contact him at oleksak@ trekconsulting.com.  www.trekconsulting.com

© Copyright 2010 Michael Oleksak. All rights reserved.

By Michael Oleksak

Over the next several decades, millions of U.S. businesses will be sold, merged, recapitalized, gifted, closed, or liquidated. In any of these events, both the owner and the company’s value will benefit from advance exit planning. Financial executives, whether internal or external, play a key role in educating company owners on the basics of exit planning.

If you are the lead financial officer of a privately-held business, such as CFO or VP Finance, part of your fiduciary duty is to protect the company from the risk of an unplanned change of ownership, through sudden death, of both the shares and the operation of the business.  You also play an important role in increasing the company’s value by strengthening it for the possibility of a future transition or transaction.

Whether you are an internal or external financial advisor, you should make the business owner aware of three things every owner must have: a will, a succession plan, and an exit strategy.

The will protects the ownership of the firm in case a tragedy or sudden death affects the owner.  With a will, the shares will stay out of probate court and land in the hands of the person or people chosen by the owner, thereby ensuring some sense of business continuity.

The succession plan will help with the orderly transition of the operation of the business if the owner is suddenly incapacitated.  The exercise of preparing a succession plan will also help establish whether internal management is strong enough to handle running the company without the owner.

The exit strategy will be the catalyst to determine whether the company is ready for some other entity to assume ownership. Are the books and records, processes and systems, management and employees, business model, brand, public image and reputation desirable enough for someone else to pay to acquire it? If the answer is yes, the next question is would the acquirer be external or internal?

Exit Options

The owner’s external exit options are sale to a strategic buyer or sale to a financial buyer or private equity group. Internal transfer options include a management buy-out, a sale of shares through the Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP), or gifting of shares, usually to the next generation of the owner’s family. Each of these five exit options has a different valuation range, with external transfers generally having higher values. The owner will also relinquish control of the firm after the external transaction, giving up the ability to subsidize his or her lifestyle through internal expenses. The external exit option also eliminates the owner’s control over his or her legacy, so the owner must determine his or her financial and emotional readiness to exit the business.

If the owner is emotionally ready to leave the business, but needs the highest financial return, as the financial advisor you can recommend that a sale to a third party strategic or third-party financial buyer should be considered. Under these arrangements, it’s important to calculate investment banking and legal fees, as well as taxes, because all will be subtracted from the amount of the check the owner will cash at the end of the day. Due diligence by the third party buyer will be thorough. If there are family members working in the business, their employment may be at risk if the current owner is not calling the shots.  The owner may be required to bridge any financing or value gap with seller notes or earn-outs over time.

A management buyout (MBO) creates a different risk to analyze: is the management team capable of continuing to generate enough cash to pay out the owner over time? Some industries lend themselves to MBO’s better than others, such as construction. Such a deal will require outside financing from a bank or another source, and management may be required to pledge personal assets to support a bank loan. Seller notes will also likely be part of the financing. After the buyout, the owner may still be involved and may retain some financial expense benefits under the deal. The further in advance this option is considered, the better the owner can prepare the team for the execution.

An ESOP is a tax-advantaged, though administratively complex, way for the owner to take some money off the table by selling shares to employees and management. Under a buyout or transfer through an ESOP, the owner will likely remain in control if less than 50% is sold, and will continue to have some personal expenses paid by the company.

Gifting is also a tax-advantaged way to transfer ownership, usually to (hopefully capable) family members. The owner can stay in control and have expenses paid for by the firm. This option will cause complications in relationships, especially as you get deeper into the second and third generations of the family.  Capable outside consultants with experience in family business issues should be considered to help smooth out issues.

All the options that financial executives can suggest for exit strategies carry different valuation ranges, with external transfers having higher valuation ranges (and higher tax impacts). However, a clear awareness of each will help the owner and the company mitigate risk and prepare for the future.

Published in Financial Executive

Michael Oleksak was a commercial lender for 17 years at Bank of Boston. He is a principal at Trek Consulting LLC, Woburn, Massachusetts and co-founder of the Exit Planning Exchange. He works with small and medium-sized businesses to improve performance and value and to prepare for exit.

Contact him at oleksak@ trekconsulting.com - www.trekconsulting.com

© Copyright 2010 Michael Oleksak. All rights reserved.